Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Girdhari MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to bond and conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Girdhari Mahto, was arrested in connection with a dowry death case (PS Revilganj Case No. 44 of 2025) under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleges that he, along with family members, tortured and killed the deceased for dowry demands. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that no specific overt act was alleged against him, and that the deceased had actually committed suicide, a claim supported by independent witnesses. The State opposed bail, but the court noted the absence of direct material against the petitioner and the length of his custody. Consequently, the court granted bail subject to a bond of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties and conditions regarding appearance, non‑tampering with evidence, and non‑intimidation of witnesses.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a dowry death case under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, given the lack of direct incriminating material.
  • Whether the petitioner’s claim of false implication and alleged suicide of the deceased warrants bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • dowry death
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • false implication
  • suicide
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5534 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2025 Thana- RIVILGANJ District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Girdhari Mahto S/o- Satendra Mahto R/v- Sheikhpura Ps- Revilganj Dist-
                 Saran at Chapra

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mrs. Gulnar Begum, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   11-03-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State. Perused the case diary.

                               2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Revilganj P.S. Case No. 44 of 2025 instituted for the offences

                   under Sections 80(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,

                   2023.

                               3. Prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner

                   alongwith the family members tortured and killed the deceased

                   for the non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

                   petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.

                   Petitioner is the husband of the deceased. Learned counsel for

                   the petitioner submitted that general and omnibus allegation has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5534 of 2026(3) dt.11-03-2026
                                            2/3




          been made against the             petitioner. No specific overt act is

          alleged against the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted

          that petitioner never tortured the victim and never demanded

          dowry. He further contended that, as a matter of fact, deceased

          herself committed suicide and the said fact is further supported

          by several independent witnesses. It has been submitted on

          behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since

          03.03.2025 and has no criminal antecedent.

                      5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case, there being no direct material against the petitioner

          as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this

          Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing

          of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of

          Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned

          Court in connection with Revilganj P.S. Case No. 44 of 2025,

          subject to the following conditions:

                       (I) One of the bailors shall be the petitioner’s own or a

          close family member.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5534 of 2026(3) dt.11-03-2026
                                                       3/3




                                   (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

                     fixed during the trial and shall not remain absent on two

                     consecutive dates without sufficient cause.

                                   (III) The petitioner shall not tamper with the

                     prosecution evidence or influence/intimidate any witness during

                     the course of trial.

                                   In case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions,

                     the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the

                     petitioner.



                                           (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Alok Verma/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.