Patna High Court
Janardan Singh @ Janardan Prasad SinghversusMr. Dipak Kumar Singh, The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms,
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- R P MISHRA
Holding
The Court held that the respondents had complied with the earlier order, and therefore the contempt application was dismissed.
Summary
The petitioners, three brothers, filed a contempt application alleging that the Circle Officer (Respondent No.6) had failed to comply with a September 30, 2024 order of this Court directing him to consider and dispose of an online grievance (ID 20243202006375) within two months. The State filed a show‑cause response asserting that the order had been complied with. The Court examined the show‑cause submission and found that the respondents had indeed complied with the earlier direction. Consequently, the Court held that there was no contempt. The contempt petition was therefore disposed of.
Issues considered
- Did the respondents comply with the order dated 30‑09‑2024 directing disposal of the grievance within two months?
- Whether the contempt application should be entertained in view of the alleged non‑compliance.
Subjects
- contempt
- civil writ jurisdiction
- non‑compliance of court order
- grievance redressal
- administrative law
- land reforms
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4573 of 2024
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14886 of 2024
======================================================
1. Janardan Singh @ Janardan Prasad Singh S/o- Late Radha Mohan Singh,
R/o- Village- Hurka, P.O.- Hurka, P.S.- Tilouthu, District- Rohtas.
2. Dhananjay Singh @ Dhananjay Prasad Singh S/o- Late Radha Mohan Singh,
R/o- Village- Hurka, P.O.- Hurka, P.S.- Tilouthu, District- Rohtas.
3. Damodar Singh @ Damodar Prasad Singh S/o- Late Radha Mohan Singh,
R/o- Village- Hurka, P.O.- Hurka, P.S.- Tilouthu, District- Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. Mr. Dipak Kumar Singh, The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of
Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat at Patna.
2. Mr. Mayank Warwade, The Divisional Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna.
3. Mr. Navin Kumar, The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Sasaram, District-
Rohtas.
4. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Prasad Singh, The Additional District Magistrate-cum-
Additional Collector, Rohtas (Sasaram), District- Rohtas.
5. Mr. Abhishek Kumar, The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Dehri, District-
Rohtas.
6. Mr. Harsh Hari, The Circle Officer/Anchal Adhikari, Anchal- Tilouthu,
District- Rohtas.
7. Mrs. Ankita Jain, The Block Development Officer, Tilouthu, Block-
Tilouthu.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Onkar Nath, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Swapnil Kumar Singh, AC to GP-19
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
6 18-03-2026 Heard the parties.
Patna High Court MJC No.4573 of 2024(6) dt.18-03-2026
2/3
2. The present petition has been preferred for the
following relief/s:
“1. That the instant contempt application is
being preferred for non-compliance of the
order dt.-30.09.2024 passed in C.W.J.C. No.-
14886 of 2024 by the Hon'ble Mr. Justice
Rudra Prakash Mishra whereby and
whereunder the hon'ble court was pleased to
give a direction, observing therein that
"Considering the aforesaid facts and
circumstances, the Circle Officer
(Respondent No.-6 herein) is directed to
consider the online application bearing
Grievance I.D. 20243202006375 dated
11.03.2024 (Annexure-P/3) and dispose of
the same in accordance with law within a
period of two months from the date of
receipt/production of a copy of this order."”
3. A show-cause has been filed on behalf of the
opposite parties. Learned counsel for the State, referring to
paragraph no. 8 of the show-cause submits that the order of this
Court has been complied.
Patna High Court MJC No.4573 of 2024(6) dt.18-03-2026
3/3
4. Considering the aforesaid, it appears that opposite
parties have complied the order of this Court.
5. In view of the above, the contempt application
stands disposed of.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Alok Verma/-
U
Checking your session…