Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dhiraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioners subject to bond and surety conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Summary

Petitioners Dhiraj Kumar and Aanjali Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita alleging assault with a knife, robbery of jewellery and cash. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with others, attacked an informant and her daughter, causing injuries and theft. The petitioners contended they were innocent, the incident stemmed from a land dispute, injuries were minor, and they had clean antecedents, presenting the allegations as exaggerated. The State opposed the bail. Considering the nature of the accusations, the minor injuries, the counter‑case, and the petitioners' clean record, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. The order directs that if arrested within eight weeks, the bail may be enlarged by the Judicial Magistrate‑I, Motihari.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for the offences alleged.
  • Whether the nature of the allegations, the extent of injuries and the petitioners' antecedents justify the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • assault
  • robbery
  • criminal procedure
  • bail conditions
  • land dispute

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1005 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-321 Year-2025 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Dhiraj Kumar S/o- Ramjanam Thakur R/v- Ganga Sirisiya Ps- Chakia Dist-
                  East Champaran
           2.     Aanjali Devi @ Anjali Kumari W/o- Sonu Kumar R/v- Ganga Sirisiya Ps-
                  Chakia Dist- East Champaran
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Addl. Public Prosecutor
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   21-01-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for

                   the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2),

                   74, 118(1), 109, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya

                   Sanhita.

                                3. As per prosecution case, these petitioners along

                   with other accused persons assaulted informant and her daughter

                   with knife due to which they sustained injuries. It is further

                   alleged that the accused persons also snatched gold jewellery

                   from the neck of informant and her daughter and took Rs.

                   20,000/- from the house.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Both
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1005 of 2026(2) dt.21-01-2026
                                                          2/2




                        parties are agnates and due to land dispute, altercation took

                        place in which both sides sustained injuries. Injuries sustained

                        by the injured are simple in nature. Present case is counter blast

                        of Chakia P. S. Case No. 331 of 2025 registered against

                        informant and others. Rest of the allegations are ornamental

                        only to make the case grave. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

                                     5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed

                        the bail application.

                                     6. Considering the nature of accusation, injuries, case

                        and counter case and clean antecedents, this anticipatory bail is

                        allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in

                        the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within

                        a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on

                        furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with

                        two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                        Judicial Magistrate-I, Motihari, East Champaran in connection

                        with Chakia P. S. Case No. 321 of 2025, subject to condition as

                        laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.



                                              (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.