Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mandeep SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, finding that the circumstances did not justify continued detention.

Summary

The petitioner, Mandeep Sahani, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 165 litres of country-made liquor. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating that no incriminating material was found in his possession and that the liquor was recovered from a public open area, with his name supplied by a local chowkidar. He also highlighted his lack of prior criminal record and alleged non‑compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The State opposed bail. After considering the facts, the court found the petitioner’s claim credible and, noting the absence of material evidence and his clean record, decided to grant bail on condition of a cash bond and sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act in view of the facts of the case.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition law
  • excise
  • liquor seizure
  • Section 30(a)
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • criminal procedure
  • Section 103
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10103 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-597 Year-2025 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Mandeep Sahani Son of Nanda sahani @ Nand Lal Sahni Resident of village-
                 Bheriyari (Bhedihari), , P.S- Sugauli District- East Champaran

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sugauli

                   P.S. Case No. 597 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable

                   under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 165

                   liters of country made liquor was recovered from plastic gallons.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from

                   the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got

                   no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The name of the

                   petitioner has been disclosed by the local Chowkidar. Learned

                   counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the recovery has
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10103 of 2026(2) dt.19-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     been made from open place, which is accessible to public at

                     large. The petitioner is in custody since 02.12.2025 and has got

                     no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103

                     of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

                                  5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

                     the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                                  6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                     of the case and the period of custody undergone by the

                     petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                                  7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

                     bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two

                     sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

                     below/concerned Court in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case

                     No. 597 of 2025.



                                           (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
manish/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.