Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bhola Yadav @ Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav @ Bhola Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn, and the petitioner is permitted to surrender and seek regular bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Bhola Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case arising from PS Jogbani, Araria. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and to surrender, intending to apply for regular bail. The Hon'ble Justice Satyavrat Verma granted the request, clarifying that the trial court would consider the regular bail application on its merits without prejudice. The court ordered that the anticipatory bail application be dismissed as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to surrender. Consequently, the petitioner may now approach the trial court for regular bail after surrendering.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn by the petitioner.
  • Whether the petitioner may surrender and subsequently seek regular bail without prejudice.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of bail application
  • regular bail
  • surrender
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10116 of 2026

                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2025 Thana- JOGBANI District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Bhola Yadav @ Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav @ Bhola Kumar
                 Yadav S/O Rama Yadav R/O Tikulia Basti, P.S- Jogbani, Distt.- Araria.


                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar


                                                                              ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Rahul Raj, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                                   ORAL ORDER


3   16-03-2026                      1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

                   learned APP for the State.

                                    2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, after some

                   arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail

                   application with liberty to surrender and seek regular bail.

                                    3. Permission is accorded.

                                    4. It is made clear that if petitioner surrenders and

                   seeks regular bail, the learned Trial Court shall consider the case

                   on its own merit without being prejudiced by the fact that
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10116 of 2026(3) dt.16-03-2026
                                                        2/2




                      petitioner, before this Court, withdrew his anticipatory bail

                      application.

                                      5. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail

                      application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty

                      aforesaid.



                                                              (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.