Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Lalbabu PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, directing him to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Lalbabu Prasad, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352 and 351(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that he assaulted an informant with an iron rod. The prosecution alleged that the assault caused head injury, while the petitioner’s counsel argued that the medical report showed only injuries to the finger and shoulder and no definitive head injury. The counsel also highlighted a land dispute between the parties and a counter‑version of events, noting that the petitioner had been in custody since 25‑11‑2025 and was on bail in a separate case. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the offences. Considering the lack of conclusive evidence of serious injury and the nature of the injuries as simple, the court ordered the petitioner’s release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate bail decision for the petitioner accused of assault under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, given the nature of alleged injuries and surrounding circumstances?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • assault
  • Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • simple injury
  • land dispute
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10283 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2025 Thana- BASANTPUR District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
                 Lalbabu Prasad Son of Late Rangilal Prasad R/o Village - Khawaspur, P.S. -
                 Lakri Naviganj, District - Siwan.
                                                                              ... ... Petitioner
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                       ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Upadhya, Advocate
                                                  Mrs.Tetara Kumari, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Raju Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   01-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Basantpur P.S. Case No. 150 of 2025, registered for the offence

                   under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352 and

                   351(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner along with

                   other named accused persons attacked the informant side. The

                   specific allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted on

                   the head of the informant by means of iron rod causing injury to

                   him.

                                 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

                   submits that although the petitioner is alleged to have assaulted

                   on the head of the informant by iron rod, but the injury report
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10283 of 2026(3) dt.01-04-2026
                                                      2/2




                    suggests no injury specifically on the head of the informant,

                    although injury was on finger and shoulder and the opinion was

                    kept reserved, but there is no final report regarding the same.

                    There happens to be serious land dispute between the parties

                    and there is counter version of the present occurrence also and

                    the petitioner is in custody since 25.11.2025 and although he is

                    accused in one another case, but is on bail in that case.

                                 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed

                    the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                                 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

                    as well as the fact that there is no corresponding injury on the

                    person of the informant and all the injured persons have

                    received simple injuries, let the, above named, petitioner be

                    released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten

                    thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                    satisfaction of learned court concerned, in connection with

                    Basantpur P.S. Case No. 150 of 2025.



                                               (Praveen Kumar, J)
Pawan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.