Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Lalan Kumar Hembram @ Lalo Murmur @ Lalo Murmu @ Lalo MurmurmuversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail may be granted where the accused is not in possession of the contraband and the recovery was made from an open place, absent other incriminating evidence.

Summary

Lalan Kumar Hembram was implicated in a FIR alleging the seizure of 245 litres of country‑made liquor and about 2,000 litres of semi‑finished Jawa liquor from the bank of the Santhali River, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that no contraband was found in his conscious possession, that he was not arrested at the spot, and that the recovery occurred in an open public place unrelated to his residence. The State opposed his prayer for anticipatory bail. The High Court observed that the absence of possession of the illicit liquor and the circumstances of recovery justified granting anticipatory bail, subject to a bond and sureties. Consequently, the Court ordered that the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail if arrested or if he surrenders, for a period of six weeks, upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, under the conditions of Section 482(2).

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted when the accused is not found in possession of the seized liquor
  • Whether the circumstances of recovery from an open place justify bail despite the seriousness of the offence

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • possession
  • illegal liquor
  • Section 482(2)
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10319 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2024 Thana- BASANHI District- Saharsa
                 ======================================================
                 Lalan Kumar Hembram @ Lalo Murmur @ Lalo Murmu @ Lalo Murmurmu,
                 male, aged aout 41 years, S/o Late Sidhu Hembram @ Late Sidhu Murmur
                 R/o - Chharrapatti, Santhali Tola, Ward No.12, P.S - Basnahi, District -
                 Saharsa
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND
                 MALVIYA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   17-02-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                            2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with

                   Basanhi P.S. Case No. 84 of 2024 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act.

                            3. As per the allegation in the FIR, total 245 litres of

                   country-made liquor and approximately 2000 litres of semi

                   finished Jawa liquor has been recovered from bank of Santhali

                   River.

                            4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

                   case. He next submits that no incriminating article has been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10319 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026
                                            2/3




          recovered from the conscious possession of the present

          petitioner and the petitioner has no concern with the alleged

          recovered illicit liquor. He next submits that name of the

          petitioner has been surfaced in this case only on the basis of

          suspicion and there is no other evidence against the petitioner in

          the instant case. He further submits that petitioner was not

          arrested on the spot and the place of occurrence does not

          belongs to the petitioner rather it was an open place, i.e., bank of

          Chharrapatti Santhali River. He next submits that petitioner has

          got criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition.

                  5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                  6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

          the case and submissions made by learned counsel for the

          petitioner and also the fact that neither incriminating article has

          been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner

          and nor he was arrested on the spot rather the recovery of the

          said 245 litres and approximately, 2000 litres of illicit jawa

          liquor has been made from an open space and not from the

          house of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be

          released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or

          surrender before the Trial Court within a period of six weeks
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10319 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026
                                                         3/3




                       from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

                       thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                       satisfaction learned Exclusive Special Judge, (Excise-II),

                       Saharsa in connection with Basanhi P.S. Case No.84 of 2024

                       subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of

                       the B.N.S.S.



                                            (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)
Harshita/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.