Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kundan KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Kundan Kumar applied for anticipatory bail but was arrested while the application was pending. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court examined the request and, noting the arrest, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive discussion on the merits of the bail was required.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw his anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of bail application
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10344 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-201 Year-2025 Thana- EXCISE PATORI District- Samastipur
                  ======================================================
                  Kundan Kumar S/O Lakshman Mahto Resident Of Village- Malpur, Ward No.
                  07, P.s.- Dalsinghsarai, District- Samastipur

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State Of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Shashank Shekhar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Bharat Lal
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    16-03-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, as petitioner was

                    arrested during pendency of the same.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.