Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Alok Ram @ Alok KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Alok Ram applied for bail in a case registered as Keshariya P.S. Case No. 248 of 2025, involving alleged assault with sticks and iron rods causing injuries, and charges under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, assaulted the informant’s nephew and another person. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was vague, that a co‑accused had already been granted bail, and that he had no prior criminal record, having been in judicial custody since 14‑10‑2025. The State opposed the bail. After hearing both sides, the Patna High Court found the circumstances sufficient to grant bail, directing the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under the offences charged under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 109, 308(2), 352, 351(2), 190 of the B.N.S., 2023.

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S., 2023 — s. 109, 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 190, 308(2), 351(2), 352

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • assault
  • B.N.S. 2023
  • Patna High Court
  • East Champaran

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10554 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-248 Year-2025 Thana- KESARIA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Alok Ram @ Alok Kumar S/o Shashi Ram @ Satyendra Ram Resident of
                 Village- Rajpur, P.S.- Keshariya, District- East Champaran

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Kundan Rathore @ Kundan Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mrs. Rina Sinha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Keshariya P.S. Case No. 248 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 109,

                   308(2), 352, 351(2), 190 of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the

                   informant’s nephew Rahis and Md. Afsar were surrounded by

                   accused persons including the petitioner and it is alleged that

                   they have assaulted them by means of sticks and iron rod

                   causing injuries to them.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10554 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     case. He also submits that from perusal of the FIR, it will

                     transpire that the nature of allegation is general and omnibus.

                     There is no specific allegation against anyone. He further

                     submits that similarly situated other co-accused person namely,

                     Kundan Ram has already been granted bail by the learned

                     coordinate bench of this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 61364 of

                     2025. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the

                     petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is

                     languishing in judicial custody since 14.10.2025.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                     petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                     bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                     of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief

                     Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari, East Champaran

                     in connection with Keshariya P.S. Case No. 248 of 2025.


                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.