Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sofiya Uzbekowa @ Saltanat Dizberowa @ Matiyuba @ Dizberowa @ Matiyuba SaltanatversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner on condition of a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, a citizen of Uzbekistan residing in Nepal, was arrested for allegedly entering India using a forged passport and was charged under Sections 318(4), 61 and 3(5) of the Border and National Security Act, Section 14(5) of the Foreigner Act and Section 12(2) of the Passport Act. The prosecution alleged illegal entry and possession of foreign currency, Aadhaar card and mobile. The petitioner contended innocence, lack of criminal antecedent, and that the allegations were merely speculative without material evidence. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. After hearing both sides, the Court found insufficient material to justify continued detention and ordered the petitioner to be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite charges under the Border and National Security Act, Foreigner Act and Passport Act.
  • Whether the allegations of illegal entry and possession of foreign currency constitute a ground to deny bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • illegal entry
  • fake passport
  • foreigner act
  • passport act
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10618 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-299 Year-2025 Thana- SONBERSA District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
                 Sofiya Uzbekowa @ Saltanat Dizberowa @ Matiyuba @ Dizberowa @
                 Matiyuba Saltanat, D/o Sapadkijee, Resident of Samarkand, Region-
                 Uzbekistan, at present Residing at Brahampuri, P.S.-Brahampuri, District-
                 Sarlahi (Nepal).

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Binod Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 299 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 61 and 3(5) of

                   B.N.S., Section 14 (5) of Foreigner Act and Section 12(2) of

                   Passport Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the

                   petitioner has entered in the boundaries of India on the basis of

                   fake passport.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. She has been falsely implicated in this
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10618 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026
                                                         2/2




                       case. It has further been submitted that the doubt created by the

                       informant that the petitioner may be indulged in anti-national

                       activities. It is only a doubt. No such material is there. Only

                       allegation against the petitioner is that some foreign currency

                       Aadhar Card and mobile were recovered from her. She is an

                       Uzbek national. She is having no criminal antecedent and she is

                       languishing in judicial custody since 05.11.2025.

                                    5. Learned APP appearing for the State has

                       vehemently opposed the application for bail.

                                    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                       considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                       inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                       petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                       bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                       of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M.,

                       Sitamarhi in connection with Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 299 of

                       2025.


                                                        (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.