Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chiranjeet Kumar @ Satish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail must be granted as the injuries were simple and there was no prima facie intention to cause death.

Summary

The petitioners, Chiranjeet Kumar and his son Prince Kumar, were arrested in connection with a FIR alleging assault with a rod and the butt of a pistol, causing bodily injuries and allegedly intended to cause death, arising from a long‑standing land dispute. The FIR invoked Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352 and 303(2) read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioners contended that they were falsely implicated, that the injuries were simple in nature, and that there was no intention to cause death. The learned APP opposed bail. The court, after noting the simple nature of the injuries and the lack of prima facie evidence of murderous intent, ordered the release of both petitioners on bail, subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 each and conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNS.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to bail despite the serious charges under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.
  • Whether the facts disclosed in the FIR establish a prima facie intention to cause death.
  • Whether the land‑dispute background renders the allegations against the petitioners false or mala fide.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • assault
  • land dispute
  • Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • intention to cause death
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 438
  • Section 482

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10725 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-810 Year-2024 Thana- KADAMKUAN District- Patna
                 ======================================================
           1.     Chiranjeet Kumar @ Satish Kumar, S/o Late Ram Sundar Lal Yadav
           2.    Prince Kumar, S/o Chiranjeet Kumar @ Satish Kumar
                 Both are resident of Park Road, Kadamkuan, P.S.- Kadamkuan, Distt.-
                 Patna.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioners
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Nityanand Neeraj, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioners are named in the FIR and

                   apprehending their arrest in connection with Kadamkuan P.S.

                   Case No.810 of 2024 registered under Sections 126(2),

                   115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352 and 303(2) read with 3(5) of

                   the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (in short ‘BNS’).

                                3. As per FIR, the petitioners alleged to assault the

                   informant by using rod and butt of pistol causing head and

                   bodily injuries, where assault was alleged to be made with

                   intention to cause his death. The occurence alleged to be

                   arising out of land dispute.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10725 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

          petitioners that the petitioners appears falsely implicated in

          present case in the background of land dispute, as the parties

          are in litigating terms since year 1964. It is submitted that

          one title suit bearing No.39/1964 is pending before learned

          Sub-Judge, Patna. It is pointed out that the injuries as alleged

          to be caused by petitioners upon medical examination found

          simple in nature in view of Annexure-4 of present bail petition

          and moreover the petitioner no.2 was alleged to assault with

          butt of pistol, having all occasions to cause firearm injuries,

          which also negates prima facie that he was not under

          intention to cause death of the informant.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of fact as prima facie present occurrence took

          place in the background of land dispute, where upon medical

          examination, the injuries found simple in nature prima facie

          negating intention to cause death,                   accordingly, both

          petitioners, above-named, are directed to be released on bail,

          in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10725 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                     within a period of four weeks, on furnishing bail bond of

                     Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties

                     of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     Chief     Judicial     Magistrate,        Patna      in   connection   with

                     Kadamkuan P.S. Case No.810 of 2024, subject to the

                     conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

                     CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                        (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Sanjeet/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.