Patna High Court
Sikandar Kumar @ Sikku @ Sikandar MuniversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Holding
The Court held that, in view of the lack of prima facie incriminating material, the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
Summary
The petitioner, Sikandar Kumar, was implicated in a theft case (PS Mirganj Case No. 158 of 2025) for allegedly purchasing a stolen motorcycle from a co-accused. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 317(4), 317(5) and 303(2) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita 2023. The petitioner argued that, apart from the co-accused’s statement, there was no incriminating material against him and the stolen vehicle had already been recovered, making further custody unnecessary. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail. The Court, noting the lack of prima facie evidence and the recovery of the vehicle, exercised its inherent powers under Section 482(2) of the BNSS and ordered the petitioner’s release on bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, subject to the conditions of the trial court.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in the absence of prima facie evidence despite the FIR alleging offences under Sections 317(4), 317(5) and 303(2) of the BNSS
- Whether the trial court can exercise its inherent powers under Section 482(2) of the BNSS to release the petitioner on bail
Legislation cited
- Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 — s. 303(2), 317(4), 317(5), 482(2)
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- theft
- motor vehicle
- Section 482
- BNSS
- prima facie evidence
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10790 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-158 Year-2025 Thana- MIRGANJ District- Purnia
======================================================
Sikandar Kumar @ Sikku @ Sikandar Muni S/O Bindeshwari Muni @
Vindeshwari Muni Resident of Village- Pahartol (Pahadtal), Ward No. 11, P.S-
Mirganj, Distt.- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sumit Kumar Bhagat, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Binod Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
2 24-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing
on behalf of the State.
2. The accused/petitioner apprehending his arrest in
connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 158 of 2025
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 317(4),
317(5), 303(2) of Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita 2023.
3. As per FIR, apprehended co-accused person,
namely Bittu Kumar Yadav named this petitioner from whom
and one Deepak Kumar he purchased the stolen motorcycle
which alleged to be seized from his possession.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on
behalf of the petitioner that except suspicion arising out of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10790 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026
2/3
disclosure made by apprehended co-accused, namely Bittu
Kumar, nothing incriminating appears against this petitioner.
It is submitted that petitioner was not connected in any
manner with stolen motorcycle. Admittedly recovery already
made from the possession of apprehended co-accused and,
therefore, on all material aspects the investigation of this case
appears concluded and, therefore, sending this petitioner
behind bar shall not serve any purpose of justice. In this
context, it is also pointed out that the custodial interrogation
not appears required now in view of recovery. While
concluding argument, it is submitted that petitioner found
involved in one more criminal case, where he is on bail.
5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.
6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by
taking note of fact as save and except suspicion arising out of
disclosure statement made by apprehended co-accused
person, prima facie nothing incriminating appears against
petitioner, accordingly, above named petitioner, in the event
of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court, within
a period of four weeks of the order, is directed to be released
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10790 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026
3/3
on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Purnea/concerned Court, where the case is pending in
connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 158 of 2025 subject
to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the
BNSS.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
veena/-
U T
Checking your session…