Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Abhimanyu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Abhimanyu Kumar, was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. He sought permission to withdraw that application after his arrest. The court entertained the petitioner's request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. No further orders were made.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner’s arrest

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10833 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-463 Year-2023 Thana- SHAHPUR PATORI District- Samastipur
                  ======================================================
                  Abhimanyu Kumar Son of Umesh Ray R/V.- Hasanpur Surat, P.S.- Patory,
                  District- Samastipur

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ajay Kumar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Anish Chandra
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    24-02-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application as the petitioner

                    was arrested during pendency of the same.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.