Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rakesh RayversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Rakesh Ray, was arrested after police recovered 810 litres of Nepali liquor allegedly being smuggled through his village. He was charged under Sections 274, 275, 3(5) of the BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was merely a passerby, no liquor was found in his possession, and he was implicated only on suspicion, emphasizing his clean antecedent and willingness to cooperate. The State opposed his bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence. Considering the lack of incriminating material on the petitioner, his clean record, and the circumstances of his custody, the Court granted regular bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite being charged under Sections 274, 275, 3(5) of the BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Legislation cited

  • BNS — s. 274, 275, 3(5)

Subjects

  • bail
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • suspicion
  • clean antecedent
  • regular bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10971 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2025 Thana- MADHWAPUR District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Rakesh Ray S/o Shatrughan Ray @ Satrughan Ray @ Satrudhan Ray R/o
                 village- Balwa , P.s- Madhwapur, District - Madhubani

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate.
                                                 Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Umanath Mishra, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   17-02-2026                      Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered

                   under Sections 274, 275, 3(5) of the BNS and Section 30(a) of

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, on getting secret

                   information that the illicit consignment of liquor is to be crossed

                   from the gate of Village Balwa, the police party reached there

                   and recovered 810 litres Nepali country made liquor from the

                   sacks. It is alleged that petitioner was apprehended on the spot.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. He further submits that petitioner is simply a passerby and
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10971 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026
                                                          2/2




                        he has no concern with the alleged seized liquor. Learned

                        counsel submits that no incriminating article has been recovered

                        from the conscious possession of petitioner and he has been

                        made accused in this case only on the basis of suspicion. He

                        further submits that petitioner has got clean antecedent and there

                        is no chance of his absconding or tampering with the evidence.

                        Petitioner is in custody since 22.12.2025 and he undertakes to

                        cooperate in the investigation and trial.

                                     5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer

                        for regular bail of the petitioner.

                                     6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

                        case, the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nature

                        of allegation against the petitioner and the period of custody as

                        well as his clean antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be

                        released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees

                        Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                        satisfaction of learned Court concerned in connection with

                        Madhwapur P.S. Case No.180 of 2025.



                                                (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.