Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bijendra Singh @ Bijendra Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court held that the restoration application is allowed and the case is restored to its original file.

Summary

Bijendra Singh filed a petition seeking restoration of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2189 of 2026, which had been removed from the court's docket. The petitioner argued that the case should be reinstated to its original file. The State of Bihar opposed the restoration. Justice Satyavrat Verma considered the grounds presented in the restoration application. Finding the petitioner's arguments persuasive, the court ordered that the case be restored to its original file. Consequently, the restoration application was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2189 of 2026 should be restored to its original file

Subjects

  • criminal procedure
  • restoration of case
  • high court
  • petition
  • court order

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11033 of 2026
                                               In
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2189 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-251 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Saran
                  ======================================================
                  Bijendra Singh @ Bijendra Kumar Singh S/O Shree Madan Singh R/o
                  Village- Nayka Barka Baiju Tola, P.S.- Rivilganj, District- Saran

                                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                           Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Ashad, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    16-02-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

                    learned APP for the State.

                                 2. In view of the grounds taken in the restoration

                    application, Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2189 of 2026 is

                    restored to its original file.

                                 3. The restoration application is allowed.



                                                             (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.