Patna High Court
Raj Narayan SinghversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Petitioner Raj Narayan Singh, charged under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420 and 34 of the IPC for a land‑related offence, was granted provisional bail on 19 August 2025 on the condition that he execute a sale deed of 3 decimal of land in favour of the informant. He later withdrew from that undertaking and sought to withdraw his bail application. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the bail application as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a petitioner may withdraw a bail application after provisional bail has been granted and the conditions thereof have been set.
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code — s. 34, 420, 467, 468, 471
Subjects
- bail
- provisional bail
- withdrawal of bail
- IPC
- land sale deed
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11049 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-321 Year-2021 Thana- BUXAR MUFFSIL District- Buxar
======================================================
Raj Narayan Singh S/O Late Sheo Prasad Singh R/O Village- Bechanpurwa,
P.S- Buxar (M), Distt.- Buxar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
10 09-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned
A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf
of the informant.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Buxar
(Muffasil) P.S. Case No.321/2021, registered under Sections
467, 468, 471, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner was granted the privilege of provisional bail by order
dated 19.08.2025, on the ground that petitioner was willing to
execute sale deed in favour of the informant for a piece of 3
decimal of land. It is further submitted that a detailed order was
also recorded on 13.10.2025. It is next submitted that petitioner
now has resiled from the undertaking given to the Court on
19.08.2025.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11049 of 2025(10) dt.09-01-2026
2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner after some
arguments seeks permission to withdraw the bail application.
5. Permission is accorded.
6. The bail application of the petitioner is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-
U T
Checking your session…