Patna High Court
Bipin YadavversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The Court granted anticipatory bail, directing release on bail with conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.
Summary
The petitioner, Bipin Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. He argued that he has a clean antecedent and that the FIR contains only a vague, omnibus allegation of assault without specific reference to him, and that the alleged injury was minor. The State opposed the bail. The Court noted the earlier anticipatory bail order in Cr. Misc. No.6239 of 2026 and, after considering the submissions, directed that the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S. The application was allowed.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances alleged in the FIR
- Whether the allegations in the FIR are specific enough to justify denial of bail
Legislation cited
- B.N.S. — s. 109, 126(2), 303(2), 3(5), 351(2), 352, 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- bail bond
- criminal procedure
- Section 482
- clean antecedent
- FIR
- assault
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.112 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-225 Year-2025 Thana- NARHATT District- Nawada
======================================================
Bipin Yadav S/o Krishna Yadav Resident Of Village- Rajan, P.S.- Sirdalla,
District- Nawada
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajendra Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
3 19-03-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his
arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under
Sections 126(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 303(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the
informant alleges that while he was going back home when he
was surrounded by the accused persons including the petitioner
and was assaulted. It is next submitted that from perusal of the
allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that
allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature i.e. no
specific allegation of assault is alleged against the petitioner. It
is also submitted that even the injury suffered by the injured has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.112 of 2026(3) dt.19-03-2026
2/2
been opined to be simple in nature. It is next submitted that
Office Kumar @ Afice Kumar @ Opira Kumar had approached
this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.6239
of 2026 and the same came to be allowed by an order dated
04.02.2026 by a learned Coordinate Bench.
4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail
application.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the
event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below
within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail
on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees
Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is
pending/successor Court in connection with Narhat P. S. Case
No.225 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under
Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
6. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-
U T
Checking your session…