Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kishan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the petitioner is entitled to bail subject to prescribed conditions.

Summary

Kishan Kumar was arrested in connection with the death of Munna Singh, alleged to have been assaulted by co‑accused Satrughan Singh and others, including the petitioner. The FIR also alleges that the petitioner assaulted Vicky Kumar with a sword, though no injury report or weapon description is on record. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that the specific fatal assault was attributable to Satrughan Singh and that the allegations against him are vague and unsupported. The informant opposed bail, citing a prior bail denial in a similar case (Kalyan Kumar). The court examined the post‑mortem report, noting only superficial head injuries from a fall, and found the petitioner's case distinguishable, granting bail with a cash bond and surety conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite being charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act for alleged assault and homicide.
  • Whether the petitioner's case can be distinguished from the earlier Kalyan Kumar bail denial on factual and evidentiary grounds.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • murder
  • assault
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Arms Act
  • post‑mortem report
  • co‑accused
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1183 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-313 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWANPUR HAT District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
                 Kishan Kumar S/O Kedar Singh @ Kedar Nath Singh Village- Kauria Tole,
                 Fateh Rai, P.S.- Bhagwanpur Hat, District- Siwan

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Kr. Shaswat Anand, Adv
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P.
                 For the Informant        :      Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, Sr. Advocate
                                                 Mr. Aakash Singh, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   15-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                   A.P.P. for the State and learned senior counsel appearing on

                   behalf of informant.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in Bhagwanpur Hat P. S.

                   Case No. 313 of 2025 registered for offences under Sections

                   190, 191, 192, 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109, 103, 61(2)

                   and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the

                   Arms Act.

                                3. As per F.I.R., it is specific case of informant that

                   co-accused Satrughan Singh assaulted on the head of Munna

                   Singh with Farsa, as a result of which, he fell down and

                   thereafter, this petitioner along with other co-accused persons

                   also assaulted him, as a result of which, he died. It is further
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1183 of 2026(3) dt.15-05-2026
                                            2/3




          alleged that this petitioner assaulted on the head of Vicky

          Kumar with sword.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          specific accusation of assault is against co-accused Satrughan

          Singh, who caused the fatal injury on the head of deceased.

          Allegation against petitioner of assaulting the deceased is

          general and omnibus and there is no injury report on record

          regarding the injury caused to Vicky Kumar, which itself

          falsifies the allegation levelled against petitioner. Petitioner is in

          custody since 29.07.2025. Chargesheet has been submitted.

                       5. Learned senior             counsel for   the informant

          vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that bail

          application of co-accused Kalyan Kumar @ Kalyan Rawat has

          already been rejected by this Court, vide order dated 27.01.2026

          passed in Cr. Misc. No. 82718 of 2025 and petitioner’s case

          stands on similar footing and as such, no favourable order is

          required to be passed in this case.

                       6. In response thereto, learned counsel for the

          petitioner submits that in the case of Kalyan Kumar (supra),

          post-mortem report of deceased was not brought to the notice

          and discussed and as such, petitioner’s case cannot be equated

          with said case. In post-mortem report, only one head injury was
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1183 of 2026(3) dt.15-05-2026
                                                          3/3




                        found and rests are superficial in nature, caused due to fall after

                        head injury. Cause of death is head injury. He further submits

                        that in F.I.R., there is no mention about weapon, which was used

                        by this petitioner.

                                     7. Considering the facts & circumstances of the case

                        as well as period of custody, let the above named petitioner be

                        released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten

                        thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                        satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan /

                        concerned Court in connection with Bhagwanpur Hat P.S. Case

                        No. 313 of 2025 with following conditions:-

                                                           “(i) One of the bailors shall be
                                              close relative of the petitioner.
                                                           (ii) Petitioner shall cooperate in the
                                              trial and shall remain physically present on
                                              each & every date, as fixed by the Trial Court,
                                              and on his absence on two consecutive dates,
                                              without prior permission/sufficient reason, his
                                              bail-bond shall liable to be cancelled by the
                                              Court concerned.”



                                              (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.