Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner subject to bond and surety conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Summary

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Barhat Case No. 158 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bihar Negotiable S... Act, 2023. The FIR alleged that a dispute over a DJ set led to a group assault, during which the petitioner’s relatives were attacked and property stolen, but no specific allegation of assault was made against the petitioner himself. The petitioner, who has a clean antecedent, assured cooperation with the investigation and argued that he would not abscond. The State opposed the bail, contending the seriousness of the offences. The Court, noting the absence of a direct allegation against the petitioner and his clean record, granted anticipatory bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties of equal amount, and compliance with conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. The order releases the petitioner from arrest for six weeks, pending surrender or arrest.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted in the absence of a specific allegation against the petitioner under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
  • Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent and willingness to cooperate justify bail despite the seriousness of the offences listed in the FIR.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • clean antecedent
  • FIR
  • assault
  • bail conditions
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11859 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-158 Year-2025 Thana- BARHAT District- Jamui
                 ======================================================
                 Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Kumar Yadav Son of Shiv Shankar Yadav R/o Village -
                 Bhaluka, P.S.- Barhat, District - Jamui.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Brajesh Sahay, Advocate
                                                  Ms. Aadya Dipti, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Madan Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-02-2026                   1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2),

                   191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 303(2), 109, 324(6), 331(1), 352

                   and 351(2) of the BNS, 2023.

                                 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant

                   alleges that on 28.10.2025 at about 05:30 PM his villager Golu

                   took his DJ set for idol immersion on the eve of Chhath Puja

                   and insisted on playing political songs near his house, but the

                   same was objected, as such, the accused persons including the

                   petitioner got angry and thereafter the accused persons entered
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11859 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026
                                            2/3




          his house and assaulted his mother and sister with deadly

          weapons, further Mukesh assaulted his brother Sajan by an iron

          rod causing injury on head, thereafter Krishna assaulted with

          stick causing injury on hand and Shivshankar assaulted

          Rampravesh on account of which he fell and Mukesh broke the

          window of the car and snatched Rs. 2,000/- from his pocket.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would

          manifest that no specific allegation of assault is alleged against

          the petitioner. It is also submitted that petitioner will not

          abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his

          innocence.

                       5. Learned       A.P.P.     for    the   State   opposes   the

          anticipatory bail application of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

          counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the fact

          that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and no specific

          allegation of assault is alleged against him, the petitioner above-

          named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of

          six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on

          furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

          with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11859 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026
                                                        3/3




                      the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court

                      in connection with Barhat P.S. Case No. 158 of 2025 subject to

                      the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS.

                                   7. Accordingly,         the    instant   anticipatory   bail

                      application stands allowed.



                                                              (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.