Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Prakash Jha @ Kari JhaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail should be granted to the petitioner subject to prescribed conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Prakash Jha, was arrested on allegations that he threatened to shoot the informant's son with a country‑made pistol and was subsequently handed over to police. He contended that he was falsely implicated due to village politics and had no incriminating material recovered from his possession. The prosecution relied on the informant’s statement and charged him under Sections 126(2), 352, 351(2) of the BNS and Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences, while the petitioner’s counsel highlighted his clean antecedents and prolonged pre‑trial detention since 11 October 2025. The court, considering the lack of physical evidence, the petitioner’s clean record, and the duration of custody, ordered his release on regular bail with a bond of Rs 10,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions of personal appearance and a family member as bailor.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite charges under the BNS and Arms Act.
  • Whether the prosecution’s evidence is sufficient to justify denial of bail.
  • Whether the length of pre‑trial detention and alleged political motive warrant bail.

Legislation cited

  • Arms Act — s. 25(1-b)(a), 26, 35
  • BNS — s. 126(2), 351(2), 352

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • pre‑trial detention
  • Arms Act
  • political vendetta
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1192 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2025 Thana- LAKHNAUR District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Prakash Jha @ Kari Jha s/o Laxmikant Jha @ Laxmi Kant Jha R/O Village-
                 Laufa, Ward No.-9, PS- Lakhnaour, District- Madhubani

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Jitendra Kumar Bharti
                                                 Ms. Nitu Kumari
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-01-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Lakhnaur P.S. Case No.

                   126 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 126(2), 352, 351(2) of BNS and Section 25(1-b)a, 26

                   and 35 of the Arms Act.

                                 3. The prosecution case according to informant is that

                   on 11.10.2025 at about 1:45 AM accused Prakash Jha threatened

                   by a country made pistol and was saying that he had come to

                   shoot Chandan Jha, the son of informant and later he was

                   apprehended by villagers and the country made pistol and

                   accused was handed over to the police.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1192 of 2026(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

          case. No occurrence in the manner as alleged has ever taken

          place and entire prosecution case is full of concoction and

          fabrication. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the

          conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has been

          implicated in the present case only on the basis of dirty village

          politics and previous enmity. Petitioner is languishing in judicial

          custody since 11.10.2025. A statement has been made in para 3

          of the bail petition that petitioner has clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and considering

          the period under custody, let the petitioner, above named, be

          released on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail

          bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief

          Judicial Magistrate,-I, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection

          with Lakhnaur P.S. Case No. 126 of 2025 subject to the

          following conditions :-

                       (i). Petitioner will remain physically present in trial on

          each and every date till the disposal of the case failing which, on

          two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1192 of 2026(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                                       3/3




                     the petitioner may be cancelled by the Trial Court.

                                  (ii). One of the bailor shall be his family member.



                                                 (S. B. Pd. Singh, J)


Ankit Kumar/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.