Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kuldev YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Kuldev Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application which was pending when he was arrested. He subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The petitioner’s counsel argued for withdrawal, and the State’s counsel was heard. The court granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw his anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • bail

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12476 of 2026
                          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2025 Thana- JAIPUR District- Banka
                  ======================================================
                  Kuldev Yadav Son of Ranjit Yadav R/o Village - Dharwa, Police Station -
                  Jaipur, District - Banka.

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    24-02-2026                        1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                                      2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

                    that petitioner during pendency of the anticipatory bail

                    application was arrested, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the

                    same.

                                    3. Permission is accorded.

                                   4. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                           (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.