Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Surendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Surendra Yadav was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. His counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after the arrest. The court examined the request and, finding no impediment, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was treated as withdrawn and dismissed. The order effectively leaves the petitioner without anticipatory bail protection.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12764 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2025 Thana- BAIRIYA District- West Champaran
                  ======================================================
                  Surendra Yadav Son of Late Gorakh Yadav Resident of village - Bhajua,
                  Police Station - Srinagar, District - West Champaran.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ram Kishun Prasad
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    10-03-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application as petitioner was

                    arrested during pendency of the same.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.