Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sarajul NatversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Sarajul Nat was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. He approached the Court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the withdrawal was desired due to the change in circumstances. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may withdraw an anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12804 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2026 Thana- SATHI District- West Champaran
                  ======================================================
                  Sarajul Nat S/O Late Alim Nat R/O Village- Hinglahar, Bheriharwa, P.S-
                  Sathi, Distt.- West Champaran at Bettiah.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Ms. Diksha Kumari, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    09-03-2026                     1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                                    2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

                    that petitioner during pendency of the anticipatory bail

                    application was arrested, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the

                    same.

                                    3. Permission is accorded.

                                   4. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                           (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.