Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raghav Kumar Roy @ Raghav JhaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The court held that anticipatory bail could not be granted due to the serious nature of the offences alleged against the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Raghav Kumar Roy, was implicated in a land dispute that escalated into an assault on the informant's son, resulting in the victim's death. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, attacked the victim with various weapons, causing multiple injuries that led to death. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 191(2), 190, 103(1), 115(2) and 118(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court examined the seriousness of the allegations, noting the fatal outcome and the violent nature of the assault. Considering the gravity of the charges, the court rejected the petition for anticipatory bail, ordering that the petitioner remain subject to arrest.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged murder and assault arising from a land dispute

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal law
  • murder
  • assault
  • land dispute
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13013 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-299 Year-2025 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Raghav Kumar Roy @ Raghav Jha Son of Ganesh Jha Resident of Village -
                 Susari, PO and P.S. - Baheri, District -Darbhanga, Bihar

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ajay Thakur, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, A.P.P.
                 For the Informant        :       Mr. Nishant Choudhary, Mr. Sushrut Shekhar, Adv
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   27-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant

                   and learned A.P.P for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Baheri P. S.

                   Case No. 299 of 2025, registered for offence punishable under

                   Sections 191(2), 190, 103(1), 115(2), 118(1) of the Bharatiya

                   Nyaya Sanhita.

                                3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 14.07.2025

                   at about 10 AM, some dispute arose between the parties owing

                   to land dispute and construction of boundary wall, in which it is

                   alleged that named accused persons, including petitioner,

                   assaulted the son of informant with spade, khanti, lathi and

                   tengari and while being taken to hospital, the injured (son of

                   informant) succumbed to injuries. In the post-mortem,
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13013 of 2026(2) dt.27-04-2026
                                                          2/2




                        altogether 8 injuries were found on the person of deceased.

                                     4. Considering the nature of accusation, the prayer for

                        anticipatory bail of petitioner is rejected.



                                              (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.