Patna High Court
Md. AjadversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- R P MISHRA
Holding
The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to bond and conditions.
Summary
The petitioner, Md. Ajad, was arrested as a pillion rider on a motorcycle from which 261 litres of Nepali liquor was seized, leading to charges under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, arguing that no incriminating material was found in his possession and that he had no involvement in the liquor recovery. The State opposed bail, while the petitioner’s counsel highlighted his three prior criminal antecedents and the lack of compliance with Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court examined the facts, the period of custody since 9 January 2026, and the petitioner’s claim of non‑participation, and found no compelling reason to deny bail. Consequently, the court granted bail on the condition of a Rs. 15,000 bond with two sureties and imposed standard bail conditions. The bail may be cancelled if the petitioner violates any of the stipulated conditions.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act considering the facts of the case.
- Whether the non‑compliance with Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, affects the grant of bail.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- bail
- excise
- illegal liquor
- Section 30(a)
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- criminal antecedents
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
- Section 103
- trial conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13036 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Araria
======================================================
Md. Ajad S/o Md. Safid Miya @ Safid Miyaan R/o Village- Koshikapur,
Ward No.07, P.S- Fulkaha, Dist- Araria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mukesh Kumar Rana, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Sangeeta Sharma. A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
2 24-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Araria
Excise P.S. Case No. 15 of 2026, instituted for the offences
punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and
Excise Act.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 261
liters of Nepali liquor was recovered from two motorcycles.
Petitioner was arrested on the spot.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the
present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from
the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got
no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13036 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026
2/3
was found sitting as pillion rider on the alleged motorcycle. The
petitioner is in custody since 09.01.2026 and has got three
criminal antecedents. There is no compliance of Section 103 of
the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed
the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances
of the case and the period of custody undergone by the
petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing
bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court
below/concerned Court in connection with Araria Excise P.S.
Case No. 15 of 2026, subject to the following conditions:
(I) One of the bailors shall be the petitioner’s own or
close member.
(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date
fixed during the trial and shall not remain absent on two
consecutive dates without sufficient cause.
(III) The petitioner shall not tamper with the
prosecution evidence or influence/intimidate any witness during
the course of trial.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13036 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026
3/3
In case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions,
the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the
petitioner.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
manish/-
U T
Checking your session…