Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sudish SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Sudish Singh filed an anticipatory bail application in the Patna High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought permission from the court to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the applicant has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure
  • bail

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13037 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-352 Year-2025 Thana- BAIKUNTHPUR District- Gopalganj
                  ======================================================
                  Sudish Singh S/o- Kamal Singh Resident of Village - Hemu Chhapra, P.S. -
                  Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj Bihar.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Prasoon Shekhar, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Suman Kumari Singh, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    15-04-2026                     1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                                    2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

                    that petitioner during pendency of the anticipatory bail

                    application was arrested, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the

                    same.

                                    3. Permission is accorded.

                                    4. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                         (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.