Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Satya PrakashversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Satya Prakash sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in CR No.15 of 2025, filed under section 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The complaint was lodged by his father‑in‑law alleging physical cruelty, but the petitioner argued that his wife had previously been married and had not obtained a legal dissolution before marrying him, leading to a divorce suit and suggesting a malicious motive behind the complaint. No medical evidence was produced to substantiate the cruelty allegation. The State opposed the bail application. Considering the lack of evidentiary support and the possibility of malicious prosecution, the Court granted anticipatory bail on the condition of a Rs.20,000 bond with two sureties, subject to the provisions of section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in a case under section 85 of the BNSS and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act where the complaint appears to be malicious and lacks medical evidence of cruelty.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • dowry prohibition
  • section 85 BNSS
  • section 4 Dowry Act
  • malicious complaint
  • physical cruelty
  • marriage law

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13101 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2025 Thana- SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE
                                                    District- Samastipur
                 ======================================================
                 Satya Prakash S/o Mandan Prasad Singh, R/o Village - Kishunwara, P.S -
                 Patepur, District - Vaishali at Hajipur
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar
           2.    Arvind Thakur S/o Late Ram Chandra Thakur R/o Village - Gorain, P.S -
                 Chakmehsi, District - Samastipur
           3.    Anshu Kumari W/o Satya Prakash D/o Arvind Thakur, R/o Village - Gorain,
                 P.S - Chakmehsi, District - Samastipur

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :    Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad, Adv.
                                               Ms. Rani Shashi Bharti, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :    Mr. Rajendra Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   26-02-2026                                  Heard the parties.

                                    2.   The petitioner apprehends his arrest in

                   connection with C.R. No. 15 of 2025 in which cognizance has

                   been taken under section 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and

                   section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   the instant matter is based on the complaint filed by the father-

                   in-law of the petitioner with certain allegations pertaining to the

                   matrimonial life of the petitioner, in fact the petitioner’s wife,

                   who is here O.P. No. 3, was already a married lady when she

                   solemnized marriage with this petitioner and her earlier
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13101 of 2026(2) dt.26-02-2026
                                            2/3




          marriage was with one Ashutosh Kumar Chaudhary, S/o Arvind

          Chaudhary, R/o village Gosnagar, P.S. Basopatti, Dist

          Madhubani. It is further submitted that the O.P. No. 3 without

          getting her first marriage dissolved through legal process

          entered into marriage with the petitioner, which forced the

          petitioner to file a divorce case against his wife, being Divorce

          Case No. 482/2024, before the family court, Hajipur and only

          thereafter, the father-in-law of the petitioner filed the present

          complaint case, which shows malicious intention on the part of

          the O.P. No. 2 in filing of the said complaint case. It is lastly

          submitted that there is no any medical evidence to support the

          allegation of physical cruelty.

                          4. Learned APP for the State has opposed the

          prayer of the petitioner.

                       5. In the facts and circumstances of this case,

          considering the aforesaid submissions, the pleas taken by the

          petitioner in this petition, this Court is inclined to grant the relief

          of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, let the

          petitioner named-above, in the event of his arrest or surrender

          before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks

          from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail

          bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13101 of 2026(2) dt.26-02-2026
                                                         3/3




                       sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court

                       concerned in connection with C.R. No. 15 of 2025, subject to

                       the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.




                                                 (Shailendra Singh, J)

annu/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.