Patna High Court
Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- R P MISHRA
Holding
The court held that bail should be granted to the petitioner, subject to monetary bond and strict conditions.
Summary
The petitioner, Anil Kumar, was arrested as the driver of a truck from which 864 litres of liquor were seized, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, stating he had no knowledge of the goods and that no incriminating material was found in his possession, and highlighted his lack of prior criminal record. The State opposed bail, while the petitioner’s counsel argued that the procedural requirement of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, had not been complied with. The Court, considering the circumstances and the period of custody, decided to grant bail subject to a cash bond and sureties, and imposed conditions regarding attendance, non‑tampering with evidence, and non‑intimidation of witnesses. The bail order was issued by Justice Rudra Prakash Mishra.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
- Whether the non‑compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, warrants denial of bail.
- Whether the accused’s role as a driver without knowledge of the contraband affects the bail decision.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- bail
- excise
- prohibition
- driver
- Section 30(a)
- Section 103
- criminal procedure
- court conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13183 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2026 Thana- EXCISE MADHUBAN District- East
Champaran
======================================================
Anil Kumar S/O Late Chandrama Pandey R/O Village- Balaha, P.S-
Baikunthpur, Distt.- Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
Ms. Hansha Shashwat, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Akbar Ali, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
2 24-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with
Madhuban Excise P.S. Case No. 05 of 2026, instituted for the
offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition
and Excise Act.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 864
liters liquor was recovered from Truck. Petitioner was arrested
on the spot.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the
present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from
the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13183 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026
2/3
no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel
further submitted that the petitioner is driver of the vehicle and
he has no knowledge regarding the goods loaded in the vehicle.
The petitioner is in custody since 04.01.2026 and has got no
criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of
the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed
the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances
of the case and the period of custody undergone by the
petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing
bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court
below/concerned Court in connection with Madhuban Excise
P.S. Case No. 05 of 2026, subject to the following conditions:
(I) One of the bailors shall be the petitioner’s own or
close member.
(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date
fixed during the trial and shall not remain absent on two
consecutive dates without sufficient cause.
(III) The petitioner shall not tamper with the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13183 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026
3/3
prosecution evidence or influence/intimidate any witness during
the course of trial.
In case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions,
the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the
petitioner.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
manish/-
U T
Checking your session…