Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Babulal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, directing him to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Babulal Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 108 and 3/5 of the B.N.S., 2023 concerning the alleged dowry‑related suicide of his wife. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was found hanging after being subjected to cruelty for non‑payment of dowry, and that the petitioner, as husband, was implicated. The petitioner contended that he was innocent, that the FIR was vague, that the only post‑mortem finding was a ligature mark, and that he had no prior criminal record, having been in judicial custody since 1 December 2025. The State opposed bail. After hearing both sides, the Court found insufficient material to justify continued detention and ordered the petitioner to be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a case under Sections 108 and 3/5 of the B.N.S., 2023 relating to a dowry‑related death.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • dowry death
  • Section 108
  • criminal procedure
  • matrimonial dispute

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13350 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-488 Year-2025 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka
                 ======================================================
                 Babulal Kumar S/o- Upendra Das R/v- Babhangama Ps- Amarpur Dist-
                 Banka

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   23-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 488 of 2025 (G.R. No. 2459 of

                   2025) registered for the offence punishable under Sections 108

                   and 3/5 of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the

                   informant received an information from Amarpur P.S. that his

                   daughter has committed suicide. Based on this information,

                   when the informant reached the matrimonial house of the

                   deceased, he found that his daughter was hanging with a fan. It

                   is further alleged that his daughter was subjected to cruelty on

                   account of the non-fulfillment of the dowry demand by in-laws.

                   Petitioner is the husband.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13350 of 2026(4) dt.23-04-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

          petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

          committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

          case. He also submits that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear

          that the nature of the allegation is general and omnibus. He also

          submits that from perusal of the case diary, it will transpire that

          Punam Devi (mother of the petitioner) has given information

          regarding the occurrence, and thereafter the police have

          informed the informant. He also submits that had the offence

          been committed by the petitioner and in-laws, they would have

          not informed the police. He further submits that the police have

          registered a case under Section 108 of the BNS, and from

          perusal of the postmortem report, it will transpire that only one

          antemortem injury, i.e., ligature mark was found on the neck of

          the deceased and the opinion of the doctor conducting the

          autopsy of the deceased is that the cause of death is asphyxia

          due to antemortem injury. Moreover, a statement has been made

          in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal

          antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since

          01.12.2025.

                       5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

          for the State.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13350 of 2026(4) dt.23-04-2026
                                                       3/3




                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                     petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                     bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                     of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief

                     Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Amarpur P.S.

                     Case No. 488 of 2025 (G.R. No. 2459 of 2025).



                                                (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.