Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vikash @ Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the High Court. He approached the Court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the arrest rendered the anticipatory bail unnecessary. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner can withdraw an anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13385 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-280 Year-2020 Thana- SHAHPUR PATORI District- Samastipur
                 ======================================================
                 Vikash @ Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Kumar Ray S/o- Kamlesh Ray Resident
                 of village-Hasanpur Surat Tara, Police Station- Shahpur Patori, District-
                 Samastipur.
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Md. Shakir Ahmad, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   01-04-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner was arrested during pendency of the anticipatory bail

                   application, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the same.

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                                4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                   dismissed as withdrawn.


                                                                       (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Kundan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.