Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bhola KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court held that the petitioner may withdraw his restoration application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Bhola Kumar, filed a restoration application before the Patna High Court seeking to have his earlier bail restored. He later approached the Court requesting permission to withdraw that application. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the withdrawal should be allowed. The Court considered whether a party may be permitted to withdraw a restoration application at the stage it was filed. Finding no legal impediment, the Court granted the petitioner's request. Consequently, the restoration application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw his restoration application.
  • Whether the Court can permit the withdrawal of a restoration application.

Subjects

  • restoration of bail
  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13415 of 2026
                                               In
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9742 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2025 Thana- MEHSI District- East Champaran
                  ======================================================
                  Bhola Kumar S/o Satyanarayan Rai @ Satyanarayan Ray Resident of village-
                  Rampur Shankar, P.S.- Mehsi, Distt.- East Champaran

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Abhishek Kumar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    25-02-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the restoration application.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. The restoration application is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.