Patna High Court
Geyani Kumar @ Gayani Kumar@ Geyani MahtoversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
The Court refused the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail.
Summary
Geyani Kumar was implicated in PS Alauli case No. 376 of 2025 for allegedly assaulting an informant with a knife, causing grievous injuries as per the medical report. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, asserting his innocence and a clean antecedent. The State, represented by an A.P.P., opposed the bail application, emphasizing the seriousness of the alleged offences. The Court examined the nature of the accusation and the severity of the injury inflicted. Considering these factors, the Court refused the petitioner's prayer for anticipatory bail. The order was pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances of the alleged assault.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita — s. 109, 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 3(5), 351(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- criminal procedure
- assault
- grievous injury
- bail refusal
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13481 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-376 Year-2025 Thana- ALOULI District- Khagaria
======================================================
Geyani Kumar @ Gayani Kumar@ Geyani Mahto S/o- Bajnath Mahto @
Baijnath Mahto R/v- Mohraghat Parash Ps- Alauli Dist- Khagaria
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aditya Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Asha Devi, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 27-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in Alauli P. S. Case No.
376 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under
Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 118(1), 351(2), 3(5) of the
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per F.I.R., this petitioner assaulted informant
with knife repeatedly. Doctor has found the injury to be
grievous.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner
claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed
the bail application.
6. Considering the nature of accusation and injury,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13481 of 2026(2) dt.27-04-2026
2/2
prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is refused.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-
U T
Checking your session…