Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shivam Raj @ Shivam RamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court allowed the petitioner's application for regular bail subject to specified conditions.

Summary

Shivam Raj was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the NDPS Act, with a seizure of brown sugar, a pistol and live cartridges. He petitioned for regular bail, asserting his innocence, clean antecedent and pointing to the earlier grant of bail to co‑accused in a similar case. The State opposed the bail on the seriousness of the charges. The Court, considering the nature of the allegations, the duration of his custody, his clean record and the precedent of bail to co‑accused, allowed the bail application. The bail was conditioned on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, monthly police station attendance, regular trial appearance and verification of his antecedent.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the serious nature of the offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Arms Act and NDPS Act
  • Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent and the grant of bail to co‑accused warrant bail in this case

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Arms Act
  • NDPS Act
  • clean antecedent
  • bail conditions
  • police attendance

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13702 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-442 Year-2025 Thana- RAJNAGAR District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Shivam Raj @ Shivam Ram S/O Saroj Singh R/O Vill.- Laheriyaganj, P.S.-
                 Madhubani Town, District- Madhubani

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Umesh Lal Verma
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   10-04-2026                   Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 442 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 111(2)(b), 111(3) and

                   111(4) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and

                   35 of the Arms Act and Sections 8(c), 21(b) and 29 of the NDPS

                   Act.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, a total quantity of

                   95.91 grams of brown sugar, along with illegal firearms and live

                   cartridges, was recovered from the accused persons, including

                   the petitioner. Specifically, one country-made pistol, one live

                   cartridge, and 30 grams of brown sugar were recovered from the

                   petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13702 of 2026(3) dt.10-04-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence.

          Petitioner is in custody since 11.10.2025 and has clean

          antecedent. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-

          accused persons have already been granted regular bail by this

          Court on 26.03.2026 in Cr. Misc. No. 15839 of 2026.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for bail.

                       6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the

          case, the nature of allegation, the period of custody of the

          petitioner, and the fact that similarly situated co-accused persons

          have already been granted bail, this application for regular bail

          is allowed.

                       7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be

          released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is

          pending/successor Court in connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case

          No. 442 of 2025 subject to conditions that:-

                                            (i). The petitioner will mark his
                                  attendance at the Madhubani Town Police
                                  Station on the first Sunday of each month.
                                  Any default in appearance at the Police
                                  Station would result in cancellation of bail
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13702 of 2026(3) dt.10-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                                              bond of the petitioner.
                                                         (ii) The petitioner shall appear in
                                              the trial regularly either personally or
                                              through his lawyer and shall cooperate in
                                              the trial and non-cooperation in the trial
                                              shall result in cancellation of the bail bond
                                              of the petitioner.
                                                        (iii). At the time of accepting the
                                              bail bonds of the petitioner, the Court below
                                              shall verify the fact whether the petitioner
                                              has clean antecedent or not. If it is found
                                              that the petitioner has clean antecedent then
                                              only his bail bonds shall be accepted by the
                                              Court below. However, it is made clear that
                                              the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the
                                              above-mentioned order shall not be delayed
                                              for purpose of or in the name of verification.


                                   8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                      prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                      adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                      shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                      and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                      manner.



                                                              (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.