Patna High Court
Stuti Kumar @ Astuti KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
The court refused to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Summary
The petitioner, Stuti Kumar, was accused of firing upon the knee of an informant's grandson, causing grievous injury, under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and a clean antecedent. The State opposed the bail application. The court examined the seriousness of the alleged offences and the nature of the injury. Considering the gravity of the accusations, the court refused the anticipatory bail. The order was pronounced by Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in view of the alleged offences and injury
Legislation cited
- Arms Act — s. 25(9), 27
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita — s. 109, 115(2), 126(2), 3(5), 351(2), 352
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- grievous injury
- firearms
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- Arms Act
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13732 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-212 Year-2025 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad
======================================================
Stuti Kumar @ Astuti Kumar S/o Sarvesh Prasad R/o Village - Nasratpur, P.S
- Dhanarua, District - Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gautam, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 23-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in Ghosi (okri) P. S.
Case No. 212 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable
under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 27, 25(9) of the Arms
Act.
3. As per F.I.R., this petitioner is alleged to have fired
upon the knee of grandson of informant, causing grievous
injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner
claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed
the bail application.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13732 of 2026(2) dt.23-03-2026
2/2
6. Considering the nature of accusation and injury,
prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is refused.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-
U T
Checking your session…