Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shankar Yadav @ Shankar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court grants bail to the petitioner on the condition of a Rs 10,000 bond with two sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Shankar Yadav, was arrested in connection with PS case No.1150 of 2025 for alleged assault on an informant with an iron rod, causing rib fractures and a leg fracture, and was charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and the Dayan Act. The prosecution alleged that Yadav and an accomplice attacked the informant, while the petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, that the incident was a mutual fight, and that both parties sustained injuries. He had been in judicial custody since 22 December 2025 and sought bail, asserting innocence and citing a counter‑version of events. The State opposed bail, highlighting Yadav’s two prior criminal cases. After hearing both sides, the Patna High Court considered the facts, the seriousness of the offences, and the petitioner’s antecedents, and ordered that bail be granted on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the seriousness of the offences and his prior criminal antecedents

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S., 2023 — s. 109(1), 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 3(5), 351, 352, 74

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal antecedent
  • assault
  • iron rod
  • false implication
  • judicial custody
  • surety
  • Bihar
  • Patna High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13755 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1150 Year-2025 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Shankar Yadav @ Shankar Kumar S/o Guru Prasad Yadav Resident Of
                 Village- Koniyapar, Ps- Nawada, District- Nawada

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-03-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Nawada P.S. Case No. 1150 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2),

                   109(1), 74, 352, 351, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section ¾ of

                   the Dayan Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the

                   petitioner, along with others, started abusing the informant and

                   it is alleged that the petitioner and one Guru Prasad assaulted

                   him with an iron rod on the chest, due to which ribs were

                   broken. It is specifically alleged that the petitioner has been

                   assaulted with an iron rod on the back, due to which the leg was

                   fractured.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13755 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026
                                                       2/2




                                  4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                     petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                     committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

                     case. He also submits that there is also a counter version of this

                     case. He also submits that there was free fight between the

                     parties and both sides have received injuries. He further submits

                     that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since

                     22.12.2025.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal

                     antecedent of two cases.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                     petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                     bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                     of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief

                     Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Nawada P.S.

                     Case No. 1150 of 2025.


                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.