Patna High Court
Banti Devi @ Sangita DeviversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The court will not extend the surrender time and dismissed the modification application.
Summary
The petitioners, Banti Devi and others, had been granted anticipatory bail by the High Court of Patna with a condition to surrender to the police within a specified time. They failed to surrender before the expiry of that period and subsequently filed a modification application seeking an extension of the surrender deadline. The State opposed the application, arguing that the condition was clear and binding. Justice Satyavrat Verma observed that the court consistently refuses to extend surrender time where the petitioners have neither complied with the original deadline nor approached the court before its expiry. Consequently, the modification application was dismissed, leaving the original surrender condition intact.
Issues considered
- Whether a court can extend the time for surrender in an anticipatory bail order when the petitioner has not surrendered within the stipulated period and has not approached the court before the deadline.
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- surrender deadline
- modification application
- criminal procedure
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13822 of 2026
In
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75909 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-294 Year-2023 Thana- JAMOBAZAR District- Siwan
======================================================
1. Banti Devi @ Sangita Devi W/o- Umesh Ray R/o vill.- Khusal Dumri,
Siwan, Marachhi, Bihar. 841434
2. Krishnawati Devi @ Kisnawati Devi W/o- Amar Ray R/o vill.- Khusal
Dumri, Siwan, Marachhi, Bihar. 841434
3. Rajeshwar Rai @ Rajeshwar Ravat S/o- Daroga Ravat R/o vill.- Khusal
Dumri, Siwan, Marachhi, Bihar. 841434
4. Kanti Devi W/o- Munna Ray R/o vill.- Khusal Dumri, Siwan, Marachhi,
Bihar. 841434
5. Rajeshwar Rai @ Rajeshwar Ravat S/o- Daroga Ravat R/v- Khusal Dumri
Siwan Marachhi, Bihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sumit Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 25-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The Court is taking a consistent view of not
extending the time of surrender if the petitioners have not
surrendered within the time stipulated in the order by which
they were granted anticipatory bail or have not approached the
Court prior to the time of surrender expiring.
3. Accordingly, the instant modification application is
dismissed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-
U T
Checking your session…