Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Gulshan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted as the allegations did not constitute a specific overt act against the petitioner and the court exercised its inherent powers under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Summary

The petitioner, Gulshan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case alleging his involvement in offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act, including attempted murder, assault, and illegal possession of a firearm. The prosecution’s case centered on the actions of co‑accused Gurmit Sagar, who allegedly threatened the informant, demanded ransom, and was in possession of a pistol, claiming that the petitioner was part of the alleged gang. The petitioner contended that he had committed no overt act and that the specific charge of demanding ransom pertained only to Gurmit Sagar, his nephew. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the allegations. The Court, considering the lack of direct evidence against the petitioner and invoking its inherent powers under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond and sureties, with conditions for surrender within eight weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita in view of the allegations made against him.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Arms Act
  • section 482
  • criminal procedure
  • ransom demand
  • threats

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13839 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-309 Year-2025 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai
                 ======================================================
                 Gulshan Kumar Son of Sanjay Yadav Resident of Village- Garhi Bishanpur,
                 P.S. and District- Lakhisarai

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-03-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

                                2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for

                   the offences punishable under Sections 308(4), 352, 351(2), 3(5)

                   of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 25(9) of the Arms

                   Act.

                                3. As per prosecution case, the informant’s nephew

                   co-accused Gurmit Sagar has been continuously threatening the

                   informant since 23.06.2025 through messages demanding

                   ransom, tarnishing his image and threatening to kill him. It is

                   further alleged that he always remains under the influence of

                   intoxication and holds pistol. He has also uploaded his pictures

                   along with the pistol on social media. It is further alleged that he

                   has constituted a gang of bad elements including this petitioner

                   along with other F.I.R. named accused persons who carry pistols
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13839 of 2026(2) dt.23-03-2026
                                                        2/2




                      with them.

                                   4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                      petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Specific

                      accusation of demanding ransom is against co-accused Gurmit

                      Sagar who is none other than own nephew of the informant.

                      There is no allegation of any specific overt act against the

                      petitioner.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed

                      the bail application.

                                   6. Considering backdrop of the case and nature of

                      accusation, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that

                      let the above named petitioner in the event of his

                      arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight

                      weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond

                      of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

                      amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial

                      Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Lakhisarai P. S. Case

                      No. 309 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under

                      Section 482(2) of the BNSS.



                                            (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.