Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Aashutosh Kumar Tiwari @ Chunnu Kumar @ Aashutosh Kr. TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that bail should be granted as the circumstances did not warrant continued detention.

Summary

The petitioner, Aashutosh Kumar Tiwari, was arrested in connection with a case alleging planning of a crime and sale of a looted tractor, with the prosecution alleging recovery of a loaded country-made katta, a live cartridge, a knife and a mobile phone from his possession. He filed a bail application, claiming false implication, stating that no incriminating article was found in his conscious possession and that a T.I.P. had not been conducted. The petitioner disclosed one prior criminal antecedent and had been in custody since 30-05-2025. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The Court considered the facts, the length of custody, and the lack of direct evidence linking the petitioner to the recovered items. Consequently, the Court granted bail on condition of a Rs.15,000 bond with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the serious nature of the offences and his prior criminal antecedent
  • Whether the absence of a T.I.P. and lack of direct recovery of incriminating articles from the petitioner’s conscious possession justify bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Arms Act
  • false implication
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14005 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-165 Year-2025 Thana- AMNAUR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Aashutosh Kumar Tiwari @ Chunnu Kumar @ Aashutosh Kr. Tiwari S/o
                 Pawan Tiwari Resident of Village- Hasanpura, P.S.- Madhowrah, Distt.- Saran
                 at Chapra


                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus

                 The State of Bihar


                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-02-2026             Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP

                   for the State.

                           2.       The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Amnaur P.S. Case No. 165 of 2025 instituted for the offence

                   under Sections 313, 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 338, 336(3), 340(2)

                   & 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections

                   25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

                           3.       Prosecution case, in short, is that on secret

                   information, police allegedly found four persons planning to

                   commit crime and sell a previously looted tractor near

                   Brahamsthan; on seeing police, two persons fled away and two

                   were apprehended. It is further alleged that from the possession
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14005 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026
                                            2/3




          of the petitioner, one loaded country-made katta, one live

          cartridge, one knife and one mobile phone were allegedly

          recovered.

                  4.      It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner

          that the petitioner is in custody since 30-05-2025. Petitioner

          bears one criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in

          supplementary affidavit to the present bail application.

                  5.      It has been further submitted by the petitioner’s

          counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present

          case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the

          conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further

          submitted that T.I.P. has not been conducted till date to ascertain

          the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged offence.

          Petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery.

                  6.      Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                  7.      Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case as also the period of custody of the petitioner, this

          Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                  8.      Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties

          of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14005 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                     below/concerned Court in connection with Amnaur P.S. Case

                     No. 165 of 2025.



                                           (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Alok Verma/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.