Patna High Court
Ranjit Kumar @ Ranjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- PARTHA SARTHY
Holding
The court granted regular bail to the petitioner, finding no direct allegation against him and noting his lack of criminal antecedent.
Summary
The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar, was arrested in connection with an examination fraud case (PS Case No. 334 of 2025) where another individual, Santosh Kumar, allegedly used the petitioner's identity to sit for a driver constable exam. The FIR charges under sections 318(4), 338, 336(2), 340(2), 61(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and section 10 of the Bihar Conduct of Examinations Act, 1981, but the complaint primarily targets the co‑accused Santosh Kumar, not the petitioner. The petitioner, who has been in custody since 11‑12‑2025 and has no prior criminal record, contended that he was falsely implicated. The State opposed bail, but the court noted the lack of direct allegations against the petitioner and his status as a mere beneficiary of the alleged crime. Consequently, the court ordered his release on regular bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner can be held liable for the offences alleged in the FIR under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Bihar Conduct of Examinations Act, 1981.
- Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner given the nature of the allegations and his period of custody.
Legislation cited
- Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 318(4), 336(2), 338, 340(2), 3(5), 61(2)
Subjects
- regular bail
- examination fraud
- impersonation
- criminal procedure
- Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
- Bihar Conduct of Examinations Act
- co‑accused
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14203 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-334 Year-2025 Thana- MITHANPURA District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
Ranjit Kumar @ Ranjeet Kumar Son of Shankar Yadav Resident of Village
-Shadipur PS -Banshi District -Arwal
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shailesh Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Parmeshwar Mehta, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
ORAL ORDER
2 12-03-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for
grant of regular bail in connection with Mithanpura P.S. Case
no.334 of 2025 registered under sections 318(4), 338, 336(2),
340(2), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and
section 10 of the Bihar Conduct of Examinations Act, 1981.
3. As per the prosecution case, in course of
invigilation in the examination being conducted by the Central
Selection Board for selection of Driver Constable, it is stated
that the invigilator found discrepancy in the Admit Card and
Aadhar Card of the appearing candidate namely Santosh Kumar.
On enquiry, it transpired that the said Santosh Kumar was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14203 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026
2/3
appearing in the exam in place of this petitioner namely Ranjit
Kumar.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. From the
contents of the FIR itself it would transpire that no allegation of
any offence having been committed by the petitioner in the
examination hall has been alleged in the FIR. The allegation, if
any, is against the co-accused Santosh Kumar and not the
petitioner herein. The petitioner is in custody since 11.12.2025
and has no criminal antecedent.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P
for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the
allegation mainly being against co-accused Santosh Kumar and
not the petitioner herein who at best can be said to be a
beneficiary of the crime committed by the co-accused, the
petitioner having remained in custody since 11.12.2025 and not
having any criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be
enlarged on bail in connection with Mithanpura P.S. Case
no.334 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees
Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14203 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026
3/3
satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class,
Muzaffarpur.
(Partha Sarthy, J)
Shiv/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.