Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Suraj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail but was arrested while the application was pending. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the application be withdrawn, and the court granted permission to do so. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. The order reflects the court’s procedural discretion to allow withdrawal of bail applications after arrest.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner’s arrest

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of bail application
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14208 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2026 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai
                  ======================================================
                  Suraj Kumar Son of Shankar Saw Resident of Purani Bazar, Mahavir Asthan,
                  P.S.- Lakhisarai, District- Lakhisarai

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sanjeev Kumar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Bishweshwar Ram
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    12-03-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, as petitioner was

                    arrested during pendency of the same.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.