Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner.

Summary

Shanti Devi was arrested after 320 litres of country‑made liquor were recovered near her hut in Turkauliya, East Champaran. She applied for bail, contending that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, that the recovery was from an open public area, and that no incriminating material linked her to the contraband. The prosecution charged her under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner highlighted her clean record, the lack of compliance with Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and the short period of custody since 17‑01‑2026. Considering these factors, the Court granted bail, directing a bond of Rs.15,000 with two sureties of the same amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a case of alleged illegal liquor possession under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • illegal liquor
  • prohibition law
  • criminal procedure
  • presumption of innocence

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14231 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2026 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Shanti Devi Wife of Arjun Sahani Resident of village - Kawalpur Kanhi Tola,
                 P.S.- Turkauliya, District - East Champaran
                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                       ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Manoj Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Satya Nand Shukla, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   13-03-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 27 of 2026, instituted for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya

                   Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition

                   and Excise Act.

                                3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 320

                   liters of country made liquor was recovered adjacent to the hut

                   of the petitioner in a paddy straw. Petitioner was arrested on the

                   spot.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14231 of 2026(3) dt.13-03-2026
                                                       2/2




                     the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got

                     no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel

                     for the petitioner further submitted that the recovery has been

                     made from open place, which is accessible to public at large.

                     The petitioner is in custody since 17.01.2026 and has got no

                     criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of

                     the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

                                  5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

                     the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                                  6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                     of the case and the period of custody undergone by the

                     petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                                  7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

                     bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two

                     sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

                     below/concerned Court in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case

                     No. 27 of 2026.



                                           (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
manish/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.