Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application and directed him to surrender and seek regular bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Raja Kumar, sought relief fearing arrest in a cyber‑fraud case (Rohtas Cyber P.S. Case No. 49 of 2025) filed under sections 303(2), 319(2), 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and sections 66(c), 66(d) of the Information Technology Act. The investigation linked him to the fraud through a self‑incriminatory statement of a co‑accused, alleging cheating of Rs. 38 lakhs. The High Court examined whether the petitioner was entitled to bail pending investigation. Finding that the petitioner was implicated in a serious cyber‑fraud, the Court dismissed his application and ordered him to surrender within two weeks and to apply for regular bail. The order was directed to be communicated to the Superintendent of Police, Rohtas for enforcement.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a cyber‑fraud case where his name appears in a co‑accused's self‑incriminatory statement.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • cyber fraud
  • bail
  • Information Technology Act
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • self‑incriminatory statement
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14698 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Rohtas
                 ======================================================
                 Raja Kumar S/o- Madan Prasad Kasykar @ Madan Prasad R/o- Jai Prakash
                 Marg PS-Sadar Town Distt- Hazaribagh, Jharkhand

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Ravi Bhardwaj, Advocate
                                                    Mr.Nilabh Ranjan, Advocate
                 For the State            :         Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-03-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                  2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection

                   with Rohtas (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 49 of 2025 instituted under

                   Sections 303(2), 319(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya

                   Sanhita and Sections 66(c) and 66(d) of the Information

                   Technology Act.

                                  3. The criminals committed cyber fraud and cheated

                   the informant of Rs. 38 lakhs. The name of the petitioner has

                   come during investigation in the self inculpatory statement of

                   the co-accused.

                                  4. Considering the fact that the petitioner is involved

                   in the cyber fraud and a huge amount has been cheated form
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14698 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026
                                                       2/2




                     the informant, this application is dismissed.

                                  5. The petitioner is directed to surrender within two

                     weeks from today and pray for regular bail, failing which the

                     Superintendent of Police, Rohtas will take all steps for arrest of

                     the petitioner.

                                  6. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the

                     Superintendent Police, Rohtas through FAX or e-mail for its

                     compliance.


                                                                          (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.