Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Archana Devi Chauhan @ Archana ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Archana Devi Chauhan was arrested in connection with a cyber‑P.S. case for allegedly withdrawing Rs 98,000 and routing it through an associate. She faced charges under Sections 303(2), 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 66, 66(c), 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. The petitioner claimed she was innocent, had no direct allegation against her, no criminal antecedent, and had been in judicial custody since 14‑10‑2025. The State opposed bail, but the court noted a prior bail order in a similar case (Cr. Misc. No. 66476 of 2025) and the lack of direct incriminating evidence against her. Consequently, the court granted bail on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the serious nature of the offences under the B.N.S., 2023 and the IT Act
  • Whether the petitioner is a primary accused or merely a conduit, affecting her eligibility for bail
  • Whether the petitioner’s lack of prior criminal record and the existence of a similar bail order justify release on bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • cyber crime
  • money laundering
  • Information Technology Act
  • B.N.S. 2023
  • judicial custody
  • sureties

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1495 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Arwal
                 ======================================================
                 Archana Devi Chauhan @ Archana Chauhan Wife of Pradum Nonia Resident
                 of Village- Sanctoria, P.S.- Kulti, District- Barddhaman (West Bengal)
                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Shivendra Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   05-02-2026                    Heard Mr. Shivendra Prasad, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with

                   Arwal Cyber P.S. Case No. 07 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 303(2) and 319(2) of the B.N.S., 2023,

                   Sections 66, 66(c) and 66(D) of the I.T. Act and subsequently

                   Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 was

                   added.

                                3. The case of the prosecution in short is that from the

                   account of the informant altogether Rs. 98,000/- were withdrawn

                   by the petitioner. Petitioner has transferred the sum to the bank

                   account of one Anuj and Anuj has transferred the sum in the

                   account of this petitioner.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

                   has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1495 of 2026(2) dt.05-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned

                     counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 01.12.2025

                     passed in Cr. Misc. No. 66476 of 2025, this Court has granted bail

                     to Suraj Kumar as he has undertaken to refund the amount which

                     was withdrawn by him. Petitioner is a lady and there is no direct

                     allegation against her. He further submits that a statement has

                     been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal

                     antecedent and she is languishing in judicial custody since

                     14.10.2025.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.         The above named

                     petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                     bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of

                     the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief

                     Judicial Magistrate, Arwal in connection with Arwal Cyber P.S.

                     Case No. 07 of 2025.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.