Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Abhay Paswan @ Abhay Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was not granted; the application was dismissed.

Summary

The petitioner, Abhay Paswan, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case (Mahila P.S. Case No. 04 of 2025) alleging his involvement in immoral trafficking and forced prostitution of minor girls. The prosecution alleged that he was part of an orchestra group that trafficked minors for prostitution, invoking sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the POCSO Act and the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. The Court examined the seriousness of the allegations, particularly the exploitation of children, and found them sufficient to deny anticipatory bail. Consequently, the application was dismissed and the petitioner was ordered to surrender within two weeks to obtain regular bail, failing which the police would arrest him. The order was communicated to the Superintendent of Police, Arwal for compliance.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in view of allegations of trafficking and prostitution of minor girls under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, POCSO Act and ITPA.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • trafficking of minors
  • POCSO
  • ITPA
  • criminal procedure
  • bail
  • sexual exploitation

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14989 of 2026
                           Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2025 Thana- Mahila District- Arwal
                 ======================================================
                 Abhay Paswan @ Abhay Kumar Paswan S/o Late Bansraj Paswan @
                 Vanshraj Paswan Resident of Village- Janakpur Dham, Arwal, Sipah, P.S. and
                 District- Arwal

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    XXX S/o- YYY R/v- Lav Vila Apartment Ps- Bodhgaya Dist- Gaya, p/A-
                 R.No-19, Sect.2, Ps- Bhatti Bhilai Chhatisgarh

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s      :        Mr.Mungeshwar Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State             :        Mr.Mohammad Sufyan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-03-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection

                   with Mahila P.S. Case No. 04 of 2025 instituted under Sections

                   144, 75, 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita;

                   Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act and Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6

                   of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is

                   alleged to be involved in immoral trafficking and is also

                   alleged to have forced the minor girls into prostitution.

                                4. The petitioner has been found to be a part of

                   orchestra group and is involved in trafficking minor girls for
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14989 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026
                                                       2/2




                     prostitution.

                                  5. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not

                     inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

                                  6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

                                  7. The petitioner is directed to surrender within two

                     weeks from today and pray for regular bail, failing which the

                     Superintendent of Police, Arwal will take all steps for arrest of

                     the petitioner.

                                  8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the

                     Superintendent Police, Arwal through FAX or e-mail for its

                     compliance.


                                                                          (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.