Patna High Court
Mallu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- PURNENDU SINGH
Holding
The Court held that pre‑arrest bail could not be granted given the serious nature of the allegations.
Summary
Mallu Paswan applied for pre‑arrest bail in connection with a case registered under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued that bail should be granted pending investigation. The Court examined the seriousness of the alleged offences, which include murder, culpable homicide not amounting to murder and conspiracy. Considering the grave nature of the allegations, the Court was not inclined to enlarge bail. Consequently, the application for pre‑arrest bail was rejected.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to pre‑arrest bail for offences under Sections 302, 201 and 34 IPC
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code — s. 201, 302, 34
Subjects
- pre‑arrest bail
- Indian Penal Code
- Section 302
- Section 201
- Section 34
- murder
- conspiracy
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.150 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-246 Year-2024 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad
======================================================
Mallu Paswan S/O Pravesh Paswan R/O Village - Purnadih, P.S-
Madanpur,Dist- Aurangabad
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Kumari Chandna, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satya Nand Shukla, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
ORAL ORDER
3 02-04-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection
with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 246/2026 registered for the
offence(s) punishable under Sections 302,201,34, of the IPC.
3. Considering the nature of allegation made in the
FIR, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on pre-arrest
bail.
4. Accordingly the present application stands rejected.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
Ashishsingh/-
U T
Checking your session…