Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Prince KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court held that an anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn upon the petitioner’s request and therefore dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Prince Kumar was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending. He approached the High Court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the arrest rendered the bail application moot and requested its withdrawal. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Can an anticipatory bail application be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested?

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of bail application
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15071 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2025 Thana- GHATHO District- Samastipur
                 ======================================================
                 Prince Kumar Son of Sri Hemant Kumar Rai Resident of Village - Musapur,
                 Ward No.- 09, P.S.- Ghataho, Dist.- Samastipur
                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                  ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Kumar Praveen, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Upendra Kumar, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   10-04-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner was arrested during pendency of the anticipatory bail

                   application, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the same.

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                                4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                   dismissed as withdrawn.


                                                                        (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Kundan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.