Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ramchandra Mahto @ Ramchandra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that anticipatory bail must be granted, subject to conditions, as the allegations and injuries were not of a serious nature warranting denial.

Summary

The petitioners, Ramchandra Mahto, Jitendra Mahto and Amrita Kumari, were named in an FIR for alleged assault during a land dispute on 3 January 2025. They sought anticipatory bail, claiming innocence, a clean antecedent and that the alleged assault was a minor scuffle between agnates. The State opposed the bail, relying on multiple charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court examined the nature of the accusations and the simple injuries sustained, and concluded that the circumstances did not warrant denial of bail. Accordingly, the court granted anticipatory bail, directing the petitioners to surrender within eight weeks and furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The order was pronounced by Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under the charges listed in the FIR
  • Whether the nature of the alleged assault and injuries justify denial of bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • land dispute
  • assault
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Section 482
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15124 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2025 Thana- BATHNAHA District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
           1.     Ramchandra Mahto @ Ramchandra Singh S/o Late Raudi Mahto Resident
                  of Village- Bathnaha Lakshmipur, P.S.-Bathnaha, District- Sitamarhi.
           2.    Jitendra Mahto @ Jitendra Kumar S/o Ramchandra Mahto @ Ramchandra
                 Singh Resident of Village- Bathnaha Lakshmipur, P.S.-Bathnaha, District-
                 Sitamarhi.
           3.    Amrita Kumari D/o Ramchandra Mahto @ Ramchandra Singh Resident of
                 Village- Bathnaha Lakshmipur, P.S.-Bathnaha, District- Sitamarhi.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms. Gulnar Begum, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   28-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

                   State.

                                2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for

                   the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2),

                   303(2), 109(1), 117(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352 and 3(5) of the

                   Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

                                3. It is alleged that on 03.01.2025 at about 12.00 PM,

                   all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners,

                   were forcibly constructing house on the land of informant, upon

                   protest by the informant, all the accused persons assaulted

                   informant and his brother with lathi.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15124 of 2026(2) dt.28-04-2026
                                                        2/2




                                   4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                      petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Both

                      parties are agnates and on account of land dispute, scuffle took

                      place between them in which both sides sustained injuries. Case

                      and counter case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus.

                      Injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature. Petitioners

                      claim clean antecedent.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed

                      the bail application.

                                   6. Considering the nature of accusation and injuries,

                      this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the

                      above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender

                      before the court below within a period of eight weeks from

                      today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.

                      10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like

                      amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate,

                      Sitamarhi in connection with Bathnaha P. S. Case No. 19 of

                      2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of

                      the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.



                                            (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.