Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shivam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Shivam Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case. While the application was pending, he was arrested. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court granted the request, holding that the petitioner could withdraw the application after arrest. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn by the petitioner after his arrest

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15549 of 2026
                           Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2025 Thana- FCI District- Begusarai
                  ======================================================
                  Shivam Kumar S/o Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Kumar Singh Resident of
                  village - Bihat, Khemkaranpur Tola, P.S - F.C.I., District - Begusarai

                                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr.Sarvottam Kumar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    16-03-2026               1.     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                              2.     Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, as petitioner was

                    arrested during pendency of the same.

                              3.     Permission is accorded.

                              4.     Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.