Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Joal @ Johab @ JabedversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Md. Joal applied for anticipatory bail under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. He then moved the High Court seeking permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted the permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • Criminal Procedure Code

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15625 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2025 Thana- ABADPUR District- Katihar
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Joal @ Johab @ Jabed S/O Md. Said R/O Naya tola Belwa, P.S.-
                 Abadpur, Distt.- Katihar
                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                             Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   01-04-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner was arrested during pendency of the anticipatory bail

                   application, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the same.

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                                4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                   dismissed as withdrawn.


                                                                        (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Kundan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.