Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Anandi YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to prescribed conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Anandi Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No.145 of 2024 alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 331(4) and 305 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR was lodged 12 days after the alleged incident, which the petitioner claims arose from a money‑transaction dispute with the informant, Nagina Devi. The petitioner highlighted his clean antecedent and argued that the delay and the underlying dispute warranted bail. The State opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of the alleged offences. The Court, considering the delay, the petitioner’s clean record and the statutory provisions, granted anticipatory bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties and several conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted despite the seriousness of the offences alleged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
  • Whether the 12‑day delay in lodging the FIR is a ground to deny bail.
  • Applicability of Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in granting anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • delay in FIR
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • bail conditions
  • clean antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15656 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2024 Thana- CHANAN District- Lakhisarai
                 ======================================================
                 Anandi Yadav S/O Late Chamman Yadav R/O Vill.- Basuwachak, P.S-
                 Chanan, Dist.- Lakhisarai
                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                            Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar
                                                           ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Rajive Ranjan Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER
2   12-03-2026                     Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Chanan P.S. Case No. 145 of 2024, F.I.R dated

                   30.12.2024 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 331(4), 305 of the

                   Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                               3. According to prosecution case, the FIR was lodged

                   on the written information of Nagina Devi. She alleged that on

                   18.12.2024 at about 11:00 P.M., while she and her 14-year-old

                   son were inside their house, she heard a sound and woke up to

                   find Anandi Yadav (the petitioner) trespassing inside the house.

                   It is further alleged that he was removing items from a box and,

                   when the informant objected, he assaulted her and her son. The

                   accused allegedly threatened them by pointing a pistol,

                   committed theft of gold ornaments, and fled away.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15656 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026
                                            2/3




          cause behind the incident is in respect of the money transaction,

          which is said to have been taken place between informant and

          the petitioner and because of the said dispute, the present First

          Information Report has been lodged implicating this petitioner.

          There is a delay of 12 days in lodging the case at hand and there

          is no explanation to the same. Counsel for the petitioner further

          submits that liberty may be restored to the informant that in case

          in future similar incident takes place or allegation of any

          threatening is made by the informant before the police and on

          investigation of the allegations are found to be true, then the

          informant and as also the police may be restored with liberty to

          seek cancellation of bail by initiating appropriate proceeding

          before the court concerned.

                      5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail application.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          that the petitioner undertakes that there is delay of 12 days in

          registering the First Information Report and the petitioner has

          clean antecedent. Accordingly, this Court is inclined to grant the

          privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

                       7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of

          his/her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a

          period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be

          released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15656 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026
                                                       3/3




                     Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                     satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

                     First, Lakhisarai, District-Lakhisarai in connection with Chanan

                     P.S. Case No. 145 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid

                     down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure /

                     Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and

                     with other following conditions:-

                                  (i) one of the bailors should be the family

                     member/relative of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official

                     document to show his/her bona fide;

                                  (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every

                     date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two

                     consecutive       dates     without      plausible   reason   will   entail

                     cancellation of his/her/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                                  (iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or

                     promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                     failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                     cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                  (iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any

                     criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                     to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds.



                                                   (Ajit Kumar, J)
abhishekkr/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.